HomePolitics"Labour MP Slams 'Crackpot' Amendments on Right-to-Die Bill"

“Labour MP Slams ‘Crackpot’ Amendments on Right-to-Die Bill”

Peter Prinsley, a former NHS ear, nose, and throat surgeon turned Labour MP, has criticized certain amendments proposed by the House of Lords regarding right-to-die legislation, labeling them as “crackpot.”

Representing Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket, Prinsley voiced his support for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in the Commons, highlighting his firsthand experiences of witnessing patients endure agonizing deaths. He has been advocating for an extension of the session to prevent potential delays orchestrated in the House of Lords, as he informed The Mirror.

Expressing concerns over the repercussions of halting the bill, Prinsley emphasized its alignment with the desires of the majority of the public. He stressed the limitations of palliative care and the importance of providing the option of assisted dying for patients in dire circumstances.

Drawing from his medical background, Prinsley recounted distressing cases of patients suffering from advanced head and neck cancers, underscoring the unbearable nature of their conditions leading to death.

Regarding the legalization of assisted dying, he reflected on his evolving perspective over the years, acknowledging the necessity of considering such options for individuals facing terminal illnesses. He criticized the numerous amendments introduced in the House of Lords, citing examples like mandatory pregnancy tests for terminally ill patients, which he deemed illogical and obstructive.

Prinsley proposed allowing the measure to carry over into the next session to avoid potential stalling tactics, highlighting the urgency of the matter and the need for a decisive resolution.

He expressed frustration with those opposing the bill, particularly citing the attempts to impede its progress through excessive amendments, emphasizing the discrepancy between public opinion and the actions taken in the House of Lords.

The debate surrounding assisted dying legislation continues, with proponents advocating for individual choice and compassion, while opponents raise concerns about societal implications and the role of palliative care in end-of-life scenarios.

At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the sale or sharing of your data, at any time clicking the “Do Not Sell or Share my Data” button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website and any of our services represents your acceptance of the use of cookies and consent to the practices described in our Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.

Stay Connected
Must Read
Related News